Project Veritas

NYT DEPO TAPE #1: Former Editorial Page Editor Says He ‘Endeavored’ To Consider How Readers Interpret Words in an Article But ‘Failed To Do That’

published on

Key Points

  • James Bennet, New York Times Editorial Page Editor: “I endeavored to do that, but I failed to do that.”

  • Bennet: “We did a very poor job.”

  • Bennet: “I’m the ultimate manager of the department, the decision maker of the department -- and I'm ultimately responsible for the journalism that we produce.”

[NEW YORK – Nov. 10, 2021] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing former New York Times editorial page editor, James Bennet, who led the paper’s editorial department from May 2016 until his resignation in June 2020.

Video Thumbnail Loop

The video shows Bennet being deposed under oath in an ongoing lawsuit filed by former Alaska governor, Sarah Palin. She is suing The Times after an editorial published by the paper attempted to tie her Political Action Committee to the shooting of former U.S. Congresswoman, Gabby Giffords. 


Palin’s attorney, Shane Vogt, pressed Bennet on how The Times reached its conclusions on his client’s Political Action Committee:

Shane Vogt, Attorney for Sarah Palin: “Do you consider this map (shown above) to be political incitement?”

James Bennet, New York Times Editorial Page Editor: “In the sense I was using the term that day in our editorial? Yeah, I do. I just think it's using violent imagery. I read those as gun sites, and I just don't think we should import that kind of language to talk about our political adversaries. I wish politicians wouldn't do it.”


Vogt: “You see a map there (shown above)?

Bennet: “I do.

Vogt: “You consider that to be political incitement?”

Bennet: Okay. I understand what you're asking me and the comparison you're drawing. I don't -- those don't look like gun sites to me. So, I guess I wouldn't use the same term?”

Vogt: “What do you consider the symbols on the map in exhibit 217 to be?”

Bennet: “I don't know what they're meant to represent. I mean they're meant to represent -- it says targeting strategy, but they don't look like sites to me.”

Vogt: “Do they look like bullseyes?”

Bennet: “No -- now that you say that -- yeah, I could see that.”

Vogt: “What are bullseyes used for?”

Bennet: “Targeting. Target practice.”

Vogt: “With weapons?”

Bennet: “Yeah.”

Vogt asked Bennet about the decision-making process inside The New York Times and the context behind publishing this piece:

Vogt: “Do you remember seeing the [Palin] map when it was initially circulated?”

Bennet: “I don't remember if I did.”

Vogt: “Do you know when that was?”

Bennet: “I believe it was around the time of the -- it got a lot of press attention. It is my understanding around the time of the shooting in 2011.”

Vogt: “And what's that understanding based on?”

Bennet: “I guess the -- we did a very poor job, I did, of trying to express the thought that created an inference for readers that there was a causal link between political incitement and the shooting of Gabby Giffords. The point where that happens is where we say the link to political incitement was clear.”

Vogt: “Is ‘incitement’ a strong word?”

Bennet: “I'd say so. Yeah.”

Bennet admitted to Vogt that he ultimately failed as a journalist:

Vogt: “As a journalist, are you taught to consider how the reader may interpret words you use when you're writing a piece?”

Bennet: “Yes.”

Vogt: “Did you do that when you were writing ‘America's Lethal Politics’?

Bennet: “I endeavored to do that, but I failed to do that.”

Vogt: “While you were at The Atlantic up through today during your tenure at The New York Times, have you ever published any pieces that called out the left for using what you just called incendiary rhetoric?”

Bennet: “I don't remember. I don't know.”


Vogt also asked Bennet about his family’s political connections to the Democratic Party. Bennet did not seem to remember key details about their ties to Clinton and Obama:

Vogt: “When you were a White House correspondent during the Clinton administration, was your brother Michael working there?”

Bennet: “I don't remember. I can check on that. He had -- I don't think so. I don't think so…”

Vogt: “At some point though, he did have a position within the Clinton administration, correct?”

Bennet: “He worked at the Justice Department for a while.”

Vogt: “Did your father also work with the Clinton administration?”

Bennet: “He had been with the Clinton administration. Yes.”

Vogt: “Did your brother Michael have a role with President Obama's election committee?”

Bennet: “I actually don't know the answer to that.”

Vogt: [Laughs] “Okay.” 

Bennet: “I don't. He may have.”

Vogt: “But I thought I saw something indicating that he was a co-chair of President Obama's campaign committee.”

Bennet: “It wouldn't surprise me if he was, I just don’t know.”

Vogt: “Have you ever written speeches for your brother?”

Bennet: “In his first run for Senate, I edited -- I did not write any speeches for him, but I edited and looked over a couple of speeches for him.”

Subscribe to Project Veritas on YouTube:

Follow James O’Keefe on Instagram:

Follow Project Veritas on Instagram:

Follow James O’Keefe on Telegram:

Follow Project Veritas on Telegram:

About Project Veritas

Project Veritas is a non-profit investigative news organization conducting undercover reporting. Project Veritas investigates and exposes corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions to achieve a more ethical and transparent society. Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)(3) organization.